Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Optimal Project Portfolio Selection Using Meta-Optimized Population and Trajectory-Based Metaheuristics

Selección óptima del portafolio de proyectos utilizando metaheurísticas de población y trayectoria meta-optimizadas


Superficie de respuesta estimada en función de los parámetros del GA para la última iteración del meta- optimizador.
Open | Download


Section
Articles

How to Cite
Optimal Project Portfolio Selection Using Meta-Optimized Population and Trajectory-Based Metaheuristics. (2020). Revista EIA, 17(34), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v17i34.1399

Dimensions
PlumX
Citations
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright statement

The authors exclusively assign to the Universidad EIA, with the power to assign to third parties, all the exploitation rights that derive from the works that are accepted for publication in the Revista EIA, as well as in any product derived from it and, in in particular, those of reproduction, distribution, public communication (including interactive making available) and transformation (including adaptation, modification and, where appropriate, translation), for all types of exploitation (by way of example and not limitation : in paper, electronic, online, computer or audiovisual format, as well as in any other format, even for promotional or advertising purposes and / or for the production of derivative products), for a worldwide territorial scope and for the entire duration of the rights provided for in the current published text of the Intellectual Property Law. This assignment will be made by the authors without the right to any type of remuneration or compensation.

Consequently, the author may not publish or disseminate the works that are selected for publication in the Revista EIA, neither totally nor partially, nor authorize their publication to third parties, without the prior express authorization, requested and granted in writing, from the Univeridad EIA.

Cristian David Candia Garcia
Luis Francisco López Castro
Sonia Alexandra Jaimes Suárez

Cristian David Candia Garcia,

Estudiante de Maestria en Ingeniería Industrial de la Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito. Consultor en analítica de datos en IQuartil SAS.

Luis Francisco López Castro,

Ingeniero Industrial de la Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito, Máster en Diseño y Gestión de Procesos de la Universidad de la Sabana. Experiencia académica extensa como profesor del progama de Ingeniería Industrial de la Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito e Investigador en las áreas de ingeniería de producción, algoritmos evolutivos, simulación y optimización de operaciones.


Sonia Alexandra Jaimes Suárez,

Máster en Ingeniería industrial con énfasis en Optimización y Logística de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana de Bogotá, Especialista en Economía para Ingenieros e Ingeniera Industrial de la Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito. En la Escuela es Directora de la Maestría de Ingeniería Industrial y del Centro de Estudios de Optimización, así como Coordinadora del Énfasis en Logística de la Maestría en Ingeniería Industrial.

Profesora asistente en pregrado y posgrado e investigadora del Centro de Investigaciones en Manufactura y Servicios – CIMSER en la Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito.


This article addresses the problem of project portfolio selection for the awarding of public works audits through open merit competitions (CMA) supervised by the National Roads Institute in Colombia - INVIAS. In this modality, each competitor presents a unique portfolio of historical projects to quantify its experience. As an alternative to the use of Excel spreadsheets with limited procedures of exhaustive enumeration, a meta-optimized genetic algorithm (GA) and a meta-optimized greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) were evaluated for the case study of a company with 207 experience career contracts. Both metaheuristics were able to find optimal assessment scores for different test instances, however, the GA algorithm consistently performed better in all assessment instances, finding in some cases up to 10 optimal portfolios in less than 9 minutes.


Article visits 602 | PDF visits 345


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Agarwal, A., 2018. Multi-echelon Supply Chain Inventory Planning using Simulation-Optimization with Data Resampling. arXiv:1901.00090 [math].
  2. Baykasoğlu, A., Karaslan, F.S., 2017. Solving comprehensive dynamic job shop scheduling problem by using a GRASP-based approach. International Journal of Production Research 55, 3308–3325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1306134
  3. Boryssenko, A., Herscovici, N., 2018. Machine Learning for Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization in Python for EM Problems, in: 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting. Presented at the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, pp. 541–542. https://doi.org/10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2018.8609394
  4. Cetin, O., 2018. Parallelizing simulated annealing algorithm fot TSP on massively parallel architectures. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies 11, 75–85.
  5. Chen, W., 2015. Artificial bee colony algorithm for constrained possibilistic portfolio optimization problem. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 429, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.02.060
  6. Colombia Compra Eficiente, 2017. Guía para procesos de contratación de obra pública.
  7. Crawford, B., Soto, R., Cuesta, R., Paredes, F., 2014. Application of the Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Solving the Set Covering Problem [WWW Document]. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/189164
  8. Deng, J., Wang, L., 2017. A competitive memetic algorithm for multi-objective distributed permutation flow shop scheduling problem. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 32, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2016.06.002
  9. Eshlaghy, A.T., Razi, F.F., 2015. A hybrid grey-based k-means and genetic algorithm for project selection. International Journal of Business Information Systems 18, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2015.067262
  10. Faezy Razi, F., Shadloo, N., 2017. A Hybrid Grey based Two Steps Clustering and Firefly Algorithm for Portfolio Selection. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering 10, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.22094/joie.2017.276
  11. Faia, R., Pinto, T., Vale, Z., 2016. GA optimization technique for portfolio optimization of electricity market participation, in: 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). Presented at the 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), IEEE, Athens, Greece, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2016.7849858
  12. Garcia, C., 2014. A metaheuristic algorithm for project selection and scheduling with due windows and limited inventory capacity. Kybernetes 43, 1483–1499. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2013-0245
  13. Ghayour, F., Solimanpur, M., Mansourfar, G., 2015. Optimum portfolio selection using a hybrid genetic algorithm and analytic hierarchy process. Studies in Economics & Finance 32, 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-08-2012-0085
  14. Griffith, A., Pomerance, A., Gauthier, D.J., 2019. Forecasting Chaotic Systems with Very Low Connectivity Reservoir Computers. arXiv:1910.00659 [nlin, stat].
  15. Hiassat, A., Diabat, A., Rahwan, I., 2017. A genetic algorithm approach for location-inventory-routing problem with perishable products. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 42, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.10.004
  16. Instituto Nacional de Vías, 2017. Concurso de méritos abierto CMA-DO-SRN-003-2017.
  17. Interian, R., Ribeiro, C.C., n.d. A GRASP heuristic using path-relinking and restarts for the Steiner traveling salesman problem. International Transactions in Operational Research 24, 1307–1323. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12419
  18. INVIAS, 2018. Concurso de méritos abierto CMA-DO-SRT-063-2018.
  19. Kumar, M., Mittal, M.L., Soni, G., Joshi, D., 2019. A Tabu Search Algorithm for Simultaneous Selection and Scheduling of Projects, in: Yadav, N., Yadav, A., Bansal, J.C., Deep, K., Kim, J.H. (Eds.), Harmony Search and Nature Inspired Optimization Algorithms, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer Singapore, pp. 1111–1121.
  20. Martínez-Vega, D.A., Cruz-Reyes, L., Rangel-Valdez, N., Santillán, C.G., Sánchez-Solís, P., Villafuerte, M.P., 2019. Project Portfolio Selection with Scheduling: An Evolutionary Approach. 1 10, 25–31.
  21. Mira, C., Feijao, P., Souza, M.A., Moura, A., Meidanis, J., Lima, G., Schmitz, R., Bossolan, R.P., Freitas, I.T., 2012. A GRASP-based Heuristic for the Project Portfolio Selection Problem, in: 2012 IEEE 15th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. Presented at the 2012 IEEE 15th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE), IEEE, Paphos, Cyprus, pp. 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2012.102
  22. Neumüller, C., Wagner, S., Kronberger, G., Affenzeller, M., 2012. Parameter Meta-optimization of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms, in: Moreno-Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada-Arencibia, A. (Eds.), Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 367–374.
  23. Osaba, E., Carballedo, R., Diaz, F., Onieva, E., Lopez, P., Perallos, A., 2014. On the influence of using initialization functions on genetic algorithms solving combinatorial optimization problems: A first study on the TSP, in: 2014 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS). Presented at the 2014 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS), IEEE, Linz, Austria, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EAIS.2014.6867465
  24. Panadero, J., Doering, J., Kizys, R., Juan, A.A., Fito, A., 2018. A variable neighborhood search simheuristic for project portfolio selection under uncertainty. Journal of Heuristics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-018-9367-z
  25. Pedersen, M.E.H., 2010. Tuning & Simplifying Heuristical Optimization (phd). University of Southampton.
  26. Resende, M.G.C., Ribeiro, C.C., 2016. Optimization by GRASP. Springer New York, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6530-4
  27. Shadkam, E., Delavari, R., Memariani, F., Poursaleh, M., 2015. Portfolio Selection by the Means of Cuckoo Optimization Algorithm. International Journal on Computational Science & Applications 5, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsa.2015.5304
  28. Yu, L., Wang, S., Wen, F., Lai, K.K., 2012. Genetic algorithm-based multi-criteria project portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research 197, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0819-6