Environmental impacts of solar photovoltaic systems: a revision from Life Cycle Assessments and other studies

Impactos ambientales de sistemas de energía solar fotovoltaica: una revisión de análisis de ciclo de vida y otros estudios.

Published 2022-06-06

Sample of an LCA approach for the assessment of a SPVS
Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP
Issue
Vol. 19 No. 38 (2022): Table of contents Revista EIA No. 38
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Environmental impacts of solar photovoltaic systems: a revision from Life Cycle Assessments and other studies. (2022). Revista EIA, 19(38), 3825 pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v19i38.1570
DOI

https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v19i38.1570
Dimensions
PlumX
Citations
Crossref
Citations in Crossref
Scopus
Citations in Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Citations in Europe PMC
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright statement

The authors exclusively assign to the Universidad EIA, with the power to assign to third parties, all the exploitation rights that derive from the works that are accepted for publication in the Revista EIA, as well as in any product derived from it and, in in particular, those of reproduction, distribution, public communication (including interactive making available) and transformation (including adaptation, modification and, where appropriate, translation), for all types of exploitation (by way of example and not limitation : in paper, electronic, online, computer or audiovisual format, as well as in any other format, even for promotional or advertising purposes and / or for the production of derivative products), for a worldwide territorial scope and for the entire duration of the rights provided for in the current published text of the Intellectual Property Law. This assignment will be made by the authors without the right to any type of remuneration or compensation.

Consequently, the author may not publish or disseminate the works that are selected for publication in the Revista EIA, neither totally nor partially, nor authorize their publication to third parties, without the prior express authorization, requested and granted in writing, from the Univeridad EIA.

María Carolina Romero Pereira
Autor
Alba Sánchez Coria
Autor
Show authors biography

Alba Sánchez Coria,

Estudiante de ingeniería ambiental Universidad Técnica de Darmstadt, Alemania.

Estudiante de pasantía de ingeniería ambiental, Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito

According to the 7th goal of sustainable development concluded by the United Nations (UN), energy should become clean and accessible for every human being on the planet in the upcoming decades. Clean energy is often used as a synonym for renewable, sustainable or green energy, words which are associated with a concept of low-impact technologies. However, renewable energies (REs) also have a set of negative environmental impacts (EIs), which can be identified and assessed through an EI Assessment (EIA) and/or a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). This article focuses on the revision of EIs documented in LCA studies for solar photovoltaic (PV) systems (SPVSs), the most common type of modern REs to satisfy energy demand globally.

Although different LCA studies include various environmental assessment categories, five categories were selected for analysis, namely global warming potential (GWP), land use, biodiversity loss, human health (HH) and waste generation.

The results show that documented EIs of SPVSs from LCAs depend not only on the technology, context and scale of the project, but also on the objective and scope of each study. Still, this article summarizes orientational values for the GWP, land use and fatal bird accidents related to SPVSs. Further, the research reveals the need for complementary approaches such as EIAs or toxicity studies for the assessment of biodiversity loss as well as the impacts on HH, and the lack of an existing waste management system for the million tons of waste soon to be disposed.

Article visits 1873 | PDF visits 911

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Alsema, E.; de Wild-Scholten, M. J. (2007). Keep it clean. Reducing environmental impacts from solar PV. Renewable Energy World, pp. 96-103.
  2. Anak John, C.; See Tan, L.; Tan, J.; Loo Kiew, P.; Mohd Shariff, A.; Abdul Halim, H. N. (2021). Selection of Renewable Energy in Rural Are Via Life Cycle Assessment-Analytical Hierarchy Process (LCA.AHP): A Case Study of tatau, Sarawak. Sustainability, 13(21), 1880. DOI: 10.3390/su132111880.
  3. Antonanzas, J.; Quinn, J. C. (2021). Net environmental impact of the PV industry from 2000-2025. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127791. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127791
  4. Balfour, J. R.; Shaw, M.; Bremer Nash, N. (2011). Introduction to Photovoltaic System Design. Burlington, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, pp. 2-6.
  5. Bakhiyi, B.; Labrèche, F.; Zayed, J. (2014). The photovoltaic industry on the path to a sustainable future - environmental and occupational health issues. Environmental International, 73, pp. 224-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.07.023
  6. Chowdhury, Md. S.; Rahman, K. S.; Chowdhury, T.; Nuthammachot, N.; Techato, K.; Akhtaruzzaman; Tiong, S. K.; Kamaruzzaman, S.; Nowshad, A. (2020): An overview of solar photovoltaic panels’ end-of-life material recycling. Energy Strategy Reviews, 27, pp. 100431. DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.100431.
  7. Cornejo, F.; Janssen, M.; Gaudrealt, C.; Samson, R. (2005): Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a Tool to Enhance Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Chemical Engineering Transaction, 7, pp. 521- 528.
  8. Da Pimentel Silva, G. D.; Branco, D. A. C. (2018). Is floating photovoltaic better than conventional photovoltaic? Assessing environmental impacts. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 36 (5), pp. 390-400. DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2018.1477498.
  9. Dhar, A.; Naeth, M. A.; Jennings, P. D.; El-Din, M. G. (2020). Perspectives on environmental impacts and a land reclamation strategyfor solar and wind energy systems. Science of the Total Environment, 718, pp. 134602. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134602
  10. Domínguez, A.; Geyer, R. (2017). Photovoltaic waste assessment in Mexico. Resource, Conservation and Recycling, 127, pp. 29-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.013
  11. Dubey, S.; Jadhav, N. Y.; Zakirova, B. (2013). Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts of Silicon Based Photovoltaic (PV) Technologies. Energy Procedia, 33, pp. 322-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.073.
  12. Dupraz, C.; Marrou, H.; Talbot, G.; Dufour, L.; Nogier, A.; Ferard, Y. (2011). Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: Towards new agrivoltaic schemes. Renewable Energy, 36 (10), pp. 2725-2732. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.005.
  13. Edenhofer, O.; Pichs Madruga, R.; Sokona, Y. (2012): Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  14. European Commission (2012): Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). [Online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/topics/waste-and-recycling/waste-electrical-and-electronic-equipment-weee_de.
  15. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (2021). Photovoltaics report. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/de/documents/publications/studies/Photovoltaics-Report.pdf
  16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN. FAO (2014). The Water-energy-Food Nexus. A new approach in support of food security and sustainable agriculture.
  17. Forti, V.; Baldé, C.P.; Kuehr, R.; Bel, G. (2020). The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, flows and the circular economy potential. United Nations University (UNU)/United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) – co-hosted SCYCLE Programme, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/Geneva/Rotterdam.
  18. Fthenakis, V.; Kim, H. C.; Frischknecht, R.; Raugei, M.; Sinha, P.; Stucki, M. (2011). Life cycle inventories and life cycle assessment of photovoltaic systems, New York, International Energy Agency.
  19. Fthenakis, V.; Kim, H. C. (2009). Land use and electricity generation: A life-cycle analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (6-7), pp. 1465-1474. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.017.
  20. Hernandez, R. R.; Murphy-Mariscal, M. I.; Easter, S. B.; Maestre, F. T.; Tavassoli, M.; Allen, E. B.; Barrows, C. W.; Belnap, J.; Ochoa-Hueso, R.; Ravi, S.; Allen, M. F. (2014). Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, pp. 766-779. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041
  21. Hong, J.; Chen, W.; Qi, C.;Ye, L.; Xu, C. (2016). Life cycle assessment of multicristalline silicon photovoltaic cell production in China. Solar Energy, 133, pp. 283-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.013
  22. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2020. World energy outlook 2020. Online. Available at: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/a72d8abf-de08-4385-8711-b8a062d6124a/WEO2020.pdf
  23. IEA (2021). Renewable Power. International Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-power
  24. IEA, IRENA, UNSD, WBG, WHO (2019). Tracking SDG 7: The Energy progress report, Washington DC.
  25. IFO (2015). Utility-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Power Plants. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/a1b3dbd3-983e-4ee3-a67b-cdc29ef900cb/IFC+Solar+Report_Web+_08+05.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=kZePDPG
  26. IRENA (2019), Future of Solar Photovoltaic: Deployment, investment, technology, grid integration and socio-economic aspects (A Global Energy Transformation: paper), International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Available at: https://Irena.org/publications/2019/Nov/Future-of-Solar-Photovoltaic
  27. IUCN ROWA (2019). Nexus comprehensive methodological framework: the MENA Region Initiative as a model of Nexus Approach and Renewable Energy Technologies (MINARET). Amman, Jordan: IUCN.
  28. Kafka, J.; Miller, M.A. (2020). The dual angle solar harvest (DASH) method: An alternative method for organizing large solar panel arrays that optimizes incident solar energy in conjunction with land use. Renewable Energy, 155, pp. 531-546. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.025.
  29. Kim, B.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.; Hur, T. (2013). Evaluation of the environmental performance of sc-Si and mc-SiPV systems in Korea. Solar Energy, pp, pp. 100-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.038
  30. Kim, J. Y.; Koide, D.; Ishihama, F.; Kadoya, T.; Nishihiro, J. (2021). Current site planning of medium to large solar power systems acceleratesthe loss of the remaining semi-natural and agricultural habitats. Science of the Total Environment, 779, 146475. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146475.
  31. Kosciuch, K.; Riser-Espinoza, D.; Gerringer, M.; Erickson, W. (2020). A summary of bird mortality at photovoltaic utility scale solar facilities in the Southwestern U.S. PLoS ONE, 15 (4). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232034.
  32. Loss, S. R. (2016). Avian interactions with energy infrastructure in the context of other anthropogenic threats. The Condor, 118 (2), pp. 424-432. DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-16-12.1.
  33. Loss, S. R.; Will, T.; Marra, P. P. (2015). Direct Mortality of Birds from Anthropogenic Causes. Annual Reviw of Ecology, Evolution and Systatics, 46 (1), pp. 99-120. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054133.
  34. Ludin, N. A.; Affandi, N. A. A.; Purvis-Roberts, K.; Ahmad, A.; Ibrahim, M. A.; Sophian, K.; Jusoh, S. (2021). Environmental Impact and Levelised Cost of Energy Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Systems in Selected Asia Pacific Region: A Cradle-to-Grave Approach. Energy, 13(1), pp. 396. DOI: 10.3390/su13010396
  35. Magrassi, F.; Rocco, E.; Barberis, S.; Gallo, M.; Del Borghi, A. (2018). Hybrid solar poewr system versus photovoltaic plant: A comparative analysis though a life cycle approach. Renewable Energy, 130, pp. 290-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.072.
  36. Mahmoudi, S.; Huda, N.; Behnia, M. (2021). Critical assessment of renewable energy waste generation in OECD countries: Decommissioned PV panels. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 164, pp. 105145. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105145.
  37. Mérida García, A; Gallagher, J.; McNabola, A.; Camacho Poyato, E.; Montesinos Barrios, P.; Rodríguez Díaz, J.A. (2019). Comparing the environmental and economic impacts of on- or off-grid solar photovoltaics with traditional energy sources for rural irrigation systems. Renewable Energy, 140, pp. 895-904. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.122.
  38. Muteri, V.; Cellura, M.; Curto, D.; Franzitta, V.; Longo, S.; Mistretta, M.; Parisi, M. L. (2020). Review on Life Cycle Assessment of Soar Photovoltaic Panels. Eergies, 13 (1), pp.252. DOI: 10.3390/en13010252
  39. Müller, A.; Friedrich, L.; Reichel, C.; Herceg, S.; Mittag, M.; Neuhaus, D. H. (2021). A comparative life cycle assessment of silicon PV modules: Impact of module design, manufacturing location and inventory. Solar energy Materials and Solar Cells, 230, 111277. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111277
  40. North Carolina State University (2017). Health and Safety Impacts of Solar Photovoltaics. [Online]. Available at: https://nccleantech.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Health-and-Safety-Impacts-of-Solar-Photovoltaics-2017_white-paper.pdf
  41. Ong, P.; Campbell, C.; Denholm, P.; Margolis, R.; Heath, G. (2013). Land-Use Requirements for Solar Power Plants in the United States. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/56290.pdf
  42. Peng, J.; Lu, L.; Yang, H.; (2013). Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, pp. 255-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.035.
  43. Rao, H.; Gemechu, E.; Thakur, U.; Shankar, K.; Kumar, A. (2021). Life cycle assessment of high-performance monocrystalline titanium dioxide nanorod-based perovskite solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 230, 111288. DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111288.
  44. Rix, A. J.; Steyl, J. D. T.; Rudman, J.; Terblanche, U.; van Niekerk, J. L. (2015). First Solar´s CdTe technology - performance, life cycle, health and safety assessment. [Online]. Available online: https://www.firstsolar.com/-/media/First-Solar/Sustainability-Documents/Sustainability-Peer-Reviews/CRSES2015_06_First-Solar-CdTe-Module-Technology-Review-FINAL.ashx
  45. Robinson, S.; Meindl, G. (2019). Potential for leaching of heavy metals and metalloids from crystalline silicon photovoltaic systems. Journal of Natural Resources and Development, 9, pp. 19-24. DOI: 10.5027/jnrd.v9i0.02.
  46. Romero and Higinio (2021). Energías renovables no convencionales para satisfacer
  47. la demanda energética: análisis de tendencias entre 1990 y 2018. Revista EIA, 18(36), pp.1-21. DOI: 10.24050/reia.v18i36-1513
  48. Schumacher, K. (2019). Approval procedures for large-scale renewable energy installations: Comparison of national legal frameworks in Japan, New Zealand, the EUand the US. Energy Policy, 129, pp. 139-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.013
  49. Sinha, P.; Heath, G.; Wade, A.; Komoto, K. (2019). Human Health Risk Assessment Methods for PV (Part 2: Breakage Risks). U.S. Department of Energy. DOI: 10.2172/1603943
  50. Stamford, L.; Azapagic, A. (2018). Environmental Impacts of Photovoltaics: The Effects of Technological Improvements and Transfer of Manufacturing from Europe to China. Energy Technology, 6 (6), pp. 11481160. DOI: 10.1002/ente.201800037.
  51. Tawalbeh, M.; Al-Othman, A.; Kafiah, F.; Abdelsalam, E.; Almomani, F. (2021). Environmental impacts of solar photovoltaic systems: A critical review of recent progress and future outlook. Science of the Environment, 759. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143528.
  52. U.S. Department of energy (2021a). Solar Futures Study. [Online]. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/solar-futures-study
  53. Union of Concerned Scientists (2013). Environmental Impacts of Wind Power. [Online] Available at: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/environmental-impacts-wind-power.
  54. United Nations (2021). Sustainable Development Goals. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy. [Online] Available at: www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/energy/.
  55. United Nations Environmental Programme (2015). Waste Crimes, Waste Risks: Gaps and Challenges in the Waste Sector. [Online]. Available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/9648.
  56. United Nations Environment Programme (2018). Assessing Environmental Impact – A Global Reviews of Legislation. [Online]. Available online: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/unep/documents/assessing-environmental-impacts-global-review-legislation
  57. United Nations Statistics Division (2021): Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. [Online]. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/goal-07/.
  58. Visser, E.; Perold, V.; Ralston-Paton, S.; Cardenal, A.C.; Ryan; P. G. (2019). Assessing the impacts of a utility-scale photovoltaic solar energy facility on birds in the Northern Cape, South Africa. Renewable Energy, 133, pp. 1285-1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.106
  59. World Economic Forum (2019). A New Circular Vision for Electronics. Time for a Global Reboot. [Online]. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_A_New_Circular_Vision_for_Electronics.pdf

Information

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |