Evaluación sistémica de una política de flexibilidad de volumen en una cadena de suministro distribuidora de papaya
Evaluación sistémica de una política de flexibilidad de volumen en una cadena de suministro distribuidora de papaya

Copyright statement
The authors exclusively assign to the Universidad EIA, with the power to assign to third parties, all the exploitation rights that derive from the works that are accepted for publication in the Revista EIA, as well as in any product derived from it and, in in particular, those of reproduction, distribution, public communication (including interactive making available) and transformation (including adaptation, modification and, where appropriate, translation), for all types of exploitation (by way of example and not limitation : in paper, electronic, online, computer or audiovisual format, as well as in any other format, even for promotional or advertising purposes and / or for the production of derivative products), for a worldwide territorial scope and for the entire duration of the rights provided for in the current published text of the Intellectual Property Law. This assignment will be made by the authors without the right to any type of remuneration or compensation.
Consequently, the author may not publish or disseminate the works that are selected for publication in the Revista EIA, neither totally nor partially, nor authorize their publication to third parties, without the prior express authorization, requested and granted in writing, from the Univeridad EIA.
Show authors biography
La flexibilidad de volumen es utilizada en el presente artículo para determinar la capacidad de respuesta ante cambios en los factores de deterioro de un producto perecedero en las etapas de una cadena de suministro; el objetivo principal de este estudio es evaluar el impacto que tiene esta estrategia sobre dos indicadores claves para el desempeño de la red como lo son los costos logísticos y el nivel de servicio. La investigación involucra el funcionamiento de una red de distribución de Papaya conformada por un productor y un detallista, la cual es simulada a través de Dinámica de Sistemas. Se logra establecer que una política de flexibilidad de volumen mejora notablemente indicadores como el nivel de servicio y los costos considerados en el estudio; sin embargo, utilizar esta estrategia implica asumir un mayor costo de almacenamiento de inventario y un costo adicional de aumento de capacidad.
Article visits 1601 | PDF visits 325
Downloads
- Bhunia, a. K., & Maiti, M. (1999). An inventory model of deteriorating items with lot-size dependent replenishment cost and a linear trend in demand. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 23(4), 301–308. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(98)10089-6
- Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Eckstein, D. (2014). The impact of knowledge transfer and complexity on supply chain flexibility: A knowledge-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 307–316. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.028
- Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006
- Castellanos, O., Fúquene, A., Fonseca, S., Ramírez, D., Giraldo, E., & Valencia, M. (2011). ESTUDIO DE LA CADENA PRODUCTIVA DE LA PAPAYA EN LA REGIÓN DEL NORTE DEL VALLE-BRUT.
- Croom, S., Romano, P., & Giannakis, M. (2000). Supply chain management: an analytical framework for critical literature review. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), 67–83. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(99)00030-1
- Disney, S. M., & Towill, D. R. (2003). The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 199–215. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00110-5
- Higuchi, T., & Troutt, M. D. (2004). Dynamic simulation of the supply chain for a short life cycle product—Lessons from the Tamagotchi case. Computers & Operations Research, 31(7), 1097–1114. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00067-4
- Jack, E. P., & Raturi, A. (2002). Sources of volume flexibility and their impact on performance. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 519–548. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00079-1
- Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). The bullwhip effect in supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 93–102.
- Li, R., Hongjie, L., & Mawhinney, J. (2010). A Review on Deteriorating Inventory Study. Journal of Service Science and Management, 03(01), 117–129.
- Minegishi, S., & Thiel, D. (2000). System dynamics modeling and simulation of a particular food supply chain. Simulation Practice and Theory, 8(5), 321–339. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-4869(00)00026-4
- Nita.H. Shah. (1993). Probabilistic time-scheduling model for an exponentially decaying inventory when delays in payments are permissible. International Journal of Production Economics, 32(1), 77–82.
- Padmanabhan, G., & Vrat, P. (1995). EOQ models for perishable items under stock dependent selling rate. European Journal of Operational Research, 86(2), 281–292.
- Paredes, A. M., & Salazar, A. F. (2014). Visión sistémica del análisis de la flexibilidad en cadenas de suministro de productos perecederos. Sistemas & Telemàtica, 63–86.
- Sicilia, J., González, M., Febles, J., & Alcaide, D. (2014). An inventory model for deteriorating items with shortages and time-varying demand. International Journal of Production Economics, (2003), 1–8.
- Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2007). Flexibility from a supply chain Flexibility perspective : definition and review. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 685–713. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710756956
- Vickery, S., Calantone, R., & Dröge, C. (1999). Supply Chain Flexibility : An empirical study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3), 16–24.
- Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., & Lim, J.-S. (2003). Manufacturing flexibility: defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), 173–191. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00067-0